A lot of people monetize their blogs with Text Links Ads. I mean, why not? If you’re not making a pile of cash with adsense, your low traffic, better than PR2 blog or web site can make an extra hundred bucks per month using this service. Just list your site, and you can sell up to 8 text ads. Ad rates are based on your page rank and alexa rating, you could charge $5 – $30 per month per ad. You can hand select the advertisers you want to approve or deny if you choose.
So what what’s the problem – the service is just like adsense really – isn’t it? People are buying ads on your site, hoping for clicks back to their products or services aren’t they? Well, the first difference is adsense is a “contextual” ad service. Ads are placed on your site based on the keywords and phrases on your pages, trying to match up the most relevant ads to your content. Text link ads not only might not be relevant, the purchaser buys the link for an entire month on your site. Adsense only pays you if someone clicks on an ad, with text link ads you get paid the same amount if no one clicks, or if 1,000 people click.
The reason this issue came up for me was because I was (today) considering putting text links ads back on one of my sites. I did it once, and nobody bought any ads – and I thought I’d give it a try. I was reading a post by Gaman at Sabahan.com about How to make $500 per month or more from Text Links Ads. Gaman’s ideas was to get 10 running sites with PR2 or higher, and sell text link ads on all of them. If each blog makes $50/mo from TLA, then you are making $500 per month. I wasn’t thinking of putting the ads on 10 sites by any means, but it got me thinking about putting them on 2 or 3.
I went back to the text link ads web site, and logged into my (old) account. I enabled my site, and downloaded the WP plugin, and then added the code to my sidebar (on another site) to sell ads. While I was in the sidebar, I decided to add in a “most recent comments” block, and went to check out some plugins to get that done. The guy that writes the Most Recent Comments plugin just happenned to have a post (listed in the sidebar) entitled “Goodbye Text Link Ads. Well, give that I had just installed TLA in my site – I just HAD to read that, now didn’t I??
That post in the FreePress Blog talks about getting rid of text link ads on his site because he believes that it can (or will in the very near future) negatively impact your site. The crux of it is that while the site is called Text Link *ADS*, you are selling links (on a monthly basis) on your site. Google firmly states in their Quality Guidelines that you should not engage in the buying or selling of text links.
This is what they say:
“Don’t participate in link schemes designed to increase your site’s ranking or PageRank. Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you’d feel comfortable explaining what you’ve done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, “Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn’t exist?”
In fact, Matt Cutts, Google’s head of web spam has blogged about this multiple times – including his post “How to Report Paid Links. That’s right – if you believe a site has engaged in buying links, you can report them to google.
So what can happen to you if google finds out you’ve bought (or sold) links? They can penalize you. They can penalize you in search results first, and if you use either Adwords or Adsense your account could be banned. If you don’t worry about traffic from google, or don’t use adsense or adwords – so what, right? Continue to use TLA or another similar service. But for most of us (since google is the largest search engine), we rely heavily on traffic from google search, and most of us would not want to jeapordize our adsense revenue (especially if you use it on multiple sites).
Now let me back peddle a bit and talk specifically about WHY Text Links Ads are bad. The TLA service is primarily selling links for the purpose of gaining google Pagerank (PR). Page Rank is a factor that google uses to score your site’s performance on a scale of 1 to 10. In fact, the way to get a better score is by getting other site to link to you with a higher pagerank. The thought of buying text links from half a dozen PR5 sites at $15/mo each is very appealing, if for that $90 per month you can essentially ‘buy’ a better spot in google search results. It might be far easier (and cheaper) to do that than use Adwords to pay for 10,000 clicks at 6 cents each. The way the google algorithm works, a hyperlink is a “vote”. Sites with higher pagerank that have a link carry more weight than one with a low or zero pagerank. Google feels that if you buy text links (directly or through a service) you are “buying votes” – or indirectly buying a higher rank in search results.
You might say “just rel=nofollow the links”, but with TLA that’s not possible. Read this post about “Dropping Text Links Ads by h0bbel, where he talks about his recent experiences with TLA. He added the rel=nofollow tag in himself, and Text Link Ads told him to remove it. He references Ryan Jones at dotcult.com and his post “Text Link Ads A Scam“. Ryan had his account suspended when he added nofollow to the TLA on his site. Ryan pointed out that no where in TLA Terms of Service does it state you can’t do this. With h0bble, TLA put in his account that he was using ‘nofollow’ and all his advertisers that had been buying links with him (for months) didn’t renew – and then he closed his account.
Isn’t this all just a really tell tale sign that using TLA is definitely violating google’s TOS? If those advertisers weren’t buying the ads for the “link juice” alone – why didn’t any of them renew with h0bble? He points out that on the Text Links Ads web site home page it says
Improve your traffic and search engine rankings. Only TLA can deliver an ad that does both.
. So – they are actually in a way boasting that you can “improve (BUY) search engine rankings” – aren’t they?
Now let’s be clear – I’ve seen and read a lot of posts, stories, and comments on this subject. One thing that I see a lot of people misconstruing is the difference between “buying traffic” and “buying search engine rankings”. It is against Google’s TOS to buy rankings, but buying traffic is not. They are two completely different things. You can buy traffic in many ways, and there are dozens and dozens of services to do it from – including the big ones like Google Adwords, Microsoft AdCenter, and Yahoo! Sponsored Search. The easiest way to explain this to you, is to quote a comment from Matt Cutt’s himself:
“…there’s absolutely no problem with selling links for traffic (as opposed to PageRank). At http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/hidden-links/ I mention a couple ways to sell links that Google would have no problem with.”
Many people think that is using TLA is bad – then similar services like AdBrite must be as well. Here’s what Matt had to say about that:
“…I believe AdBrite constructs their links with JavaScript so that links are being sold for traffic, not to affect search engines. Things like JavaScript, the nofollow attribute (or meta tag), or doing a link through a redirect that is robots.txt’ed out would be techniques to sell links for visitors/traffic, as opposed to trying to influence search engine rankings.”
When I really think about it, it’s surprising that TLA has gotten as far as it has. Read this article about Page Rank Penalties and see if you don’t think the company in question sounds exactly like TLA? I mean, this article was written back in 2002, and that company got a PR0, and about every site in the network of ads was affected negatively. I read this post on Sphinn about Text-Link-Ads.com hit by Google Penalty a month ago, and it appears that TLA doesn’t even rank for the term “text links ads” anymore – which means that they were hit with a google penalty. I see they had ‘bought’ the top spot (in adwords) in search results for those keywords, but they don’t rank in search results at all. Is the beginning of the end for TLA? If you use their service to sell ads on your site will you and your google pagerank be affected? If not now, you probably will be in the future. I don’t want any google penalties – so I for one will not be using Text Links Ads at all. It’s a definite Blogging Mistake to use Text Links Ads.
Here are some articles on the same subject:
Google’s Take on Text Links Ads
Matt Cutts on Hidden Links
Do you have comments on Text Links Ads, google pagerank, or buying links? Please comment now below, and share with everyone!
You have made insightful comments on this. Some will say Google has no right to do this, but I think they’re concerned with the integrity of their ranking algorithm.
I’ve written about this topic too.
http://www.wptextads.com/blog/2007/05/17/does-google-hate-paid-links-not-really-says-matt-cutts/
Definitely a good read. The question still remain as to the fate of TLA. Google has so far not taken concrete steps to penalize such sites, or at least there has been no widespread rundowns against sites which are involved in trading. I believe for Google it certaily is not difficult to figure out algo to reaveal paid links with certainity.
The most interesting observation is from hobbel, who added nofollow and TLA still ran it down.
I can confirm that publishing Text Links Ads has resulted in three of my sites being slapped with a Google penalty. One site has been completely de-indexed and the other 2 have vanished for any search phrase that they may have ranked for.
My advice to anyone contemplating using this type of service that does not comply with Googles’ TOS is to stay well away from it.
Hi,
This is something that I have been reading about a lot recently.
I know this won’t make one iota of difference – Google have laid down their policy but just to play Devil’s Advocate here for a moment – why don’t Google go the other way and then everyone is happy?
I.e. why dont they look for paid ads and realise they could actually HELP them.
If I spend $1000/month on the term “Red Widgets”, Google can be pretty sure I consider my site to be relevant to the phrase or I wouldn’t use those words would I?
Just a thought and it wouldn’t need us all to go tittle tattling on other websites like a bunch of kids.
You might think, “Yeah but the rich guy can buy himself to the top of Google by buying 10000 links”.
Well, Google have never based SERPS solely on Links and the other parts of their algorithm would come into play.
Besides, the net is being dominated and controlled by one rich guy already anyway… Google!
I have to admit, this worry has been at the back of my mind for a few months now, and it’s become quite a dilemma for many webmasters, I’m sure.
I’ve been with Text-Link-Ads for about two years, adding a dozen or so of my websites, plus numerous high-PR internal pages. I saw nothing particularly wrong with it at the beginning, but I can definitely understand why Google wants to discourage the practice.
My “problem” is that I’m making about $1,200/month from TLA now, making it my strongest income source (about twice what I get from Adsense), and I’m obviously not eager to give it up on the basis of a few internet rumours and mysterious statements from Google.
All of my sites are otherwise search engine friendly with unique, high-quality content, and I find it hard to believe that Google would be malicious enough to destroy my entire business (and that of many other bloggers) just for taking advantage of this one profitable little loophole.
If Google wants to tweak their algorithm to discount paid links and make the practice less beneficial, that’s fair enough — the market will dry up naturally. But will they really penalize thousands of honest bloggers for earning a few easy dollars while they still can? We’re only human after all…
I notice that “text links ads” did not show the text-links-ads.com,
Maybe it is the results for Penalty.
But I wound say that it is not unfair For the rules of Search engine!
The searchengine should diliver the right and just Results for the visitors.
The text-links-ads.com can just said selling your ad space at text-link-ads but not said buying and selling links…….
But it is the same as before!!!!!!!
Please Do not debate with buying and selling links, It is no use I think.
Hi, i just want to say thank you for the information. I just thinking to monetize my Blog with Text Link Ads. But after i read this article, i think i’m gonna cancel it.
Free Download99s last blog post..Movavi Video Converter
It’s a real bummer that this is true, there are some sites where it really is just hard to monetise them, and TLA or similar programs are about the only thing that will work. Google has an awful lot of power….
Thanks for sharing. It’s a pity because I’ve been tempted a few times to give TLA a try, but if it comes down to a choice between them and Google, I’m going to have to toe Google’s line every time. My sites are just too dependent on search traffic to risk getting penalized.
Rodney Smiths last blog post..Does Google penalize paid links?
I canceled my TLA publisher account yet in September 2007 because of their stupid policy forcing you to accept link placement BEFORE you know its price. Please check siteadvisor.com review page for text-link-ads.com site and submit your comments there
Andys last blog post..EF Commander 6.80
Agree with Rodney-
Just too dangerous to risk google traffic to mess with, if
you are getting significant or at least meaningful traffic.
There must be other paid link type services that do fly
under the radar though….
Mike Rutkowskis last blog post..How To Use Twitter Effectively
By the way, what success have people had using adbrite? If any?
Mike Rutkowskis last blog post..How To Use Twitter Effectively
I have gotten a check from AdBrite every month for the last year…
Has there been any changes on TLA since this blog was posted or since the last comment? I am curious if its still an issue with google…
of course it’s still a big issue with google, but they only catch so many sites. Any time you deal with paid links you risk pissing off google, but you may or may not get caught.
It’s a just a bit too much ah? There’s some sites where it is just hard to monetise, and “TLA” and a few other programs are the only thing that works. Google just has too much control over things!!
If selling buying text links is so bad in google eyes, then why is text-links-ads.com has such a high (6) page rank?
I think the problem with Text link ads is its not a fair share. One, if one client subscribes to your text link and pays per month. If he doesn’t get enough visit to his site, it’s not fair for the clients part. Another one, how bout if the client gets a lot of visit to his website and still its the same amount you get because you are paid monthly and not per click.Isn’t it unfair for your part? I prefer adsense than Text link ads. Anyway, great job on this post. Very nice article.
@Kevin – are you kidding me right now? text-links-ads.com and http://www.text-link-ads.com has NO PAGERANK, it’s been completely DEINDEXED by google, it doesn’t even exist in google at all. Google hates it – and they threw it out.
@admin – Really? if so it didn’t last long:
site:site:www.text-link-ads.com -> Results 1 – 10 of about 98 from http://www.text-link-ads.com. (0.06 seconds)
Pretty difficult to know what and who to believe. Let’s try it, then!
It’s not difficult at all – they were out of the index for YEARS and still don’t come up for their own search terms “text link ads”. Google will deindex you for using and buying text link ads – use services like this with caution.